How much of your revenue rests on one SKU, and what does that say about your strategy?There are really two broad ecommerce models to separate before we talk concentration: brands that sell what they make, and retailers that sell what others make. Think Solo Stove or HexClad on one side, Dick’s Sporting Goods or Backcountry on the other. The risk profile, the margin levers, and the acceptable level of product concentration look very different depending on which camp you are in. I’m working with a high SKU count reseller. One product accounts for roughly 25 percent of total revenue. Thousands of SKUs live on the site, yet a single item is carrying a quarter of the revenue. That is workable, but it is also a structural risk. If the supplier cant supply, if pricing pressure shows up, if Google or Meta quietly shift the auction in a way that impacts this exact item, the business will suffer. How a product becomes the hero (and stays there)Most “hero dominance” stories fall into a handful of patterns:
None of that is inherently bad. It just explains how brands got here. The problem is relying on one pillar and never building a second or third. Owned brand vs reseller: different baselines, different ceilingsIf you manufacture or private label, early concentration can be rational. Year one and year two where 60 to 90 percent of revenue comes from the flagship SKU is fine. The question is whether that share compresses as you add variants, bundles, and new lines. If three years in, one SKU still controls 70 percent, you are a product company with a website, not a brand with a portfolio. If you are a reseller or marketplace, the logic flips. Your edge is selection, merchandising, and buying power. Seeing any single SKU above 20 percent suggests over-reliance on one supplier or one algorithm. Revenue is partially outsourced to someone else’s stability and Google’s mood swings. What “healthy” looks like in practiceThese are reference points to stress test against your own margin structure and growth stage:
Strategic moves if you are over-exposedYou do not fix concentration by hoping the hero keeps printing. You fix it by shifting demand while you still control the levers.
If nothing stands out at allThe opposite problem: no SKU crosses two percent of sales. Diversity can be healthy, but it can also mean nothing is remarkable. If you cannot name a flagship that reliably introduces people to your brand, the issue may be positioning, not concentration. Data worth actually pulling (and sharing)
Your turnWhat percent of your revenue is tied to your top SKU? Owned-brand and comfy at 75 percent? Reseller sweating at 30 percent? Got a chart or an edge case worth talking about? I’ll surface the most useful submissions so everyone can calibrate against real numbers. Drop it here (anonymous is fine): → https://forms.gle/F1JETFN6fASSkCu77 Talk soon, John Sciacchitano |